Menu Close

Two for Six

Review of The Two Doctors (#140)

DVD Release Date: 29 Jul 20
Original Air Date: 16 Feb – 02 Mar 1985
Doctors/Companions: Six, Two, Perpugilliam Brown, Jamie McCrimmon
Stars: Colin Baker, Patrick Troughton, Nicola Bryant, Frazer Hines
Preceding Story: The Mark of the Rani (Six, Peri)
Succeeding Story: Timelash (Six, Peri)

Robert Holmes is among the most revered writers in Classic Who fandom (and rightfully so, imo), so when I fired up my DVD of The Two Doctors to refresh my memory for this review, I was utterly surprised to see his name in the credits. It’s not that I had remembered this serial as particularly bad, whereas most Holmes titles are distinctly among the good, but rather that I didn’t have a very strong sense of the story at all.

I always make a few notes for myself before a re-watch about what details of the particular adventure I actually recall, and they were pretty thin on the ground this time. Aside from the presence of the eponymous reincarnations—Two serving as support for Six—I remembered the Androgums (though not by name; all I could pull out was the final syllable), the location shooting in Spain, a lepidopterist, and Jaime trapped in some sort of matrix-y space.

While all of those details are accurate (to a point), they don’t really do the story justice. Nor do they include one of the major elements of the story: the Sontarans. Somehow in the mess of details in this adventure (which, as it aired in an era of 45-minute-long episodes, comprises three episodes rather than the more-usual-for-Classic-Who six episodes), the old standby alien race fell into obscurity in my memory.

I suspect the reason for the Sontarans’ lack of impact on me has less to do with them and their role in the adventure than with the Androgums’ disproportionate mindshare. The species, as represented by one-and-a-half individuals (or maybe one plus two half-individuals), is aesthetically unpleasant, overly aggressive in its pursuit of new culinary delights (particularly meat), and dismissive of other sentient species. They’re a bit hard to forget.

The other truly notable element of The Two Doctors is the fact that it was shot on location in Spain. While the outdoor shots of the hacienda are pretty and all, the real “money shots” are those in Seville itself in Part Three. Even plebs like me who could believe the other location shots were filmed in any of a number of places can appreciate the specificity of the shots within the city.

And there are a couple of good lines. Perhaps most notably, at least to those of us who have seen Frasier Hines on the convention circuit, is this Jaime/Two exchange: “Look at the size of that thing, Doctor.” / “Yes, Jaime. It is a big one.” But I also enjoyed Peri’s line, “Circular logic will only make you dizzy, Doctor.”

As for the story, it’s… fine. I don’t think it lives up to some of Holmes’s other work, but it makes internally consistent sense and has enough twists to keep a viewer engaged. The best parts, of course, are when the Doctor interacts with himself, and Colin Baker and Patrick Troughton do a good job playing off each other and highlighting some of their respective regenerations’ stereotypical characteristics.

So for a viewer who enjoys the timey-wimey goodness of a multi-Doctor story, with lovely location shots, a memorable new alien species, and a relatively convoluted diabolical plot involving multiple parties, The Two Doctors is a fine choice. Just don’t get attached to the guest characters. Or your lunch.

1 Comment

  1. Wholahoop

    Things I can recall about this –
    * Androgums being an anagram of Gourmands – hence Shockeye’s penchant for good catering!
    * Instead of Sevilla, the original location was meant to be New Orleans, again because of the food side of things
    * The continuity nerd in me thinking that the 2nd Doctor was never an agent of the Time Lords as he only met them in his final story, The War Games. I have read that Holmes had gotten Pertwee’s 3rd Doctor being used as an agent of the Time Lords mixed up with Troughton, hence the plotline that we had. Still, creative people came up with Season 6B to explain this which is a marvelous testament to fandom’s ability to twist the facts to fit their appropriate narrative.

    At the time I got really irritated by the director filming the Sontarans at an angle that showed a massive gap between their collar and their neck as it seemed so wrong – typical Who fan I know. The other thing that seemed wrong about the Sontarans to me was that they seemed to be too tall and at least 21st Century Who would appear to agree with that!

    As to the story, not bad but not a classic either for me, and I’m still not convinced that the Doctor, having killed Shockeye with cyanide, should have cracked the joke about him being mothballed. He’s not James Bond!

    I have always felt that S22 was too violent and I feel that this happened as a result of the success of the gritty realism seen in Caves of Androzani. I don’t dispute Eric Saward’s comment that if you show violence you need to show the real impact of it, I just question the amount of violence that was shown in S22.

    One benefit of this story was that Robert Holmes was finally persuaded to novelise one of his own stories for the Target range and it was a cracking read.

Comments are closed.