Common fan knowledge puts a Time Lord’s Regeneration limit at 13. That is, a Time Lord can regenerate twelve times for a total of thirteen Regenerations (or incarnations). A couple of years ago, Russell T. Davies (RTD), the man greatly responsible for bringing Doctor Who back to our screens in 2005, once again added his own particular brand of fan-geekery to the mix, trying to show everyone in yet another way that he “knows better” than us.
In an episode of The Sarah Jane Adventures called “The Death of the Doctor,” Eleven ends up visiting Sarah Jane and her gang again. SJS-Companion Clyde, who previously met Ten, is stunned to see this regeneration thing for himself. Whilst peppering the Doctor with questions (“Can you change color, or are you always white?” “No. I can be anything.”), he asks how often the Doctor can regenerate. The answer is a quick and flippant “five hundred and seven.”
Apparently, RTD thought that was a hoot. He could casually rewrite decades of “canon” (whatever that means) with a so-funny-he-makes-everyone-who’s-RTD-laugh line. Here’s what he has to say on the whole number-of-regenerations question:
There’s a fascinating academic study to be made out of how some facts stick and some don’t – how Jon Pertwee’s Doctor could say he was thousands of years old, and no-one listens to that*, and yet someone once says he’s only got thirteen lives, and it becomes lore. It’s really interesting, I think. That’s why I’m quite serious that that 507 thing won’t stick, because the 13 is too deeply ingrained in the public consciousness. But how? How did that get there? It’s fascinating, it’s really weird.
*Let’s not get into RTD’s own obvious ignorance/ignore-ance of the Doctor’s age.
Personally, I don’t think it’s weird at all. And here’s why.
Contrary to RTD’s assertion that it’s been said “once,” the 13 Regeneration limit has, in fact, been reiterated over and over. It was first mentioned in The Deadly Assassin, a Four story from 1976. “After the 12th regeneration, there is no plan that will postpone death,” states Coordinator Engin. This was pretty solidly in the midst of the “Golden Age” of Who – during Four’s time, when it was perhaps most popular (and probably still is most re-watched today). No wonder it stuck in fan’s minds.
But it didn’t stop there, as RTD would have us believe (and apparently even believes himself). Some four-plus years later, during The Keeper of Traken, the Master claims, “I am now nearing the end of my twelfth regeneration,” to which the Doctor responds, “Then that is the end for a Time Lord.” That’s pretty clear.
Now in between, we get a completely different mention of the race’s longevity. In The Creature from the Pit, the Doctor reminds Romana that “Time Lords have 90 lives.” “How many have you been through?” she asks. “About 130.” Far from being a change in the “canonical” number of incarnations, I believe this interchange is instead another example of Rule #1 (“the Doctor lies,” for those of you who haven’t been paying any attention to River Song). Clearly, the Doctor is being facetious, and his “I’m just funnin’ ya” attitude applies equally well here and in RTD’s line in SJA.
But it doesn’t stop with Four. In fact, the limit plays a key role in the plots of both Mawdryn Undead and The Movie. In the former, Mawdryn and his compatriots want to take the Doctor’s remaining regenerations (“eight of them; eight of me”). When Five balks, he has to explain to Tegan why he’s not willing to help like usual in this case. “If I did, it would be the end of me as a Time Lord … I can only regenerate 12 times. I have already done so four times.”
Similarly, the Master’s main purpose in The Movie is to steal the Doctor’s remaining regenerations because “a Time Lord has 13 lives, and the Master had used all of his.” In fact, Eight even goes so far as to try to explain that very fact to his Companion. “Grace! Don’t you see? I have 13 lives.” For a rogue Time Lord without any of his own, even the paltry five remaining were apparently an embarrassment of riches…
My final piece of evidence, fittingly enough, comes from a trial – Trial of a Time Lord, to be exact. In the final story of that arc, The Ultimate Foe [spoiler alert], the Master reveals that “the Valeyard is an amalgamation of the darker sides of [the Doctor’s] nature, somewhere between [his] 12th and final incarnation.” Now aside from the bizarre implications of someone being an amalgamation of parts of an individual’s personality, somehow projected between two Regenerations, it’s clear again that thirteen is the (un)lucky number.
So with a couple of exceptions-that-prove-the-rule, pre-Hiatus Who has been pretty consistent in stating that a Time Lord only gets thirteen Regenerations. (I can’t say that I recall any specific mention of it in the post-Hiatus era. Someone please remind me, if I’ve overlooked something.) No wonder it’s “ingrained in the public consciousness.”
Of course, there have also been exceptions. I guess we’ll see what happens when it all comes down to the wire for the good Doctor, a couple of regenerations from now.
13
Great article – it hadn’t occurred to me just how much it is mentioned in pre-2005 Who.
Thanks!
Yeah, it must not have occurred to RTD, either. 😉
Corroboration
Agreed. Well said 🙂
🙂
Thanks! 😀
and yet…
…the limit of 13 clearly isn’t immutable. In “The Five Doctors,” in return for the Master’s help, the Time Lords offer him “Regeneration. An entire new life cycle.” I took the use of “life CYCLE” to mean, “another 13 lives” (as the Master was then in the body he stole from Tremas, he would’ve essentially been back to #1), though even if it was only one more regeneration/life, it’s proof that the limit of 13 *can* be exceeded. Again, in the same story, Borusa states that his goal is to become “perpetual president.” “You want to be president through all your remaining regenerations?” the Doctor asks. “You underestimate my ambition, Doctor,” Borusa replies, and goes on to state that he wants to just keep on regenerating forever, past the limit of 13. So again, clearly it’s POSSIBLE to regenerate more than 12 times. It can be done, but in Time Lord society, it just isn’t.
The reasons why aren’t clear. I’m not canon, but I always presumed that the 13 limit was arbitrary, or that maybe there was only enough chronal energy (or whatever) for every Time Lord to get 13 lives, so everyone was limited to their “fair share.” If that is the case, then since the Time War and the obliteration of the Time Lords, presumably there’s all this energy out there available for use, without depriving anyone else. This should come in handy if the franchise continues past whoever replaces Matt Smith’s replacement…
Oh, absolutely
I’m with you there, Christopher! Clearly, there have always been ways around the limit, as I mentioned right at the end. Exactly why or how the Time Lords were able to get around it to make such an offer to the Master is unclear (Borusa was a completely different kettle of fish, planning to get his immortality from Rassilon), but I fully expect Moffat (or whoever’s running the show two actors from now) to devise something reasonable when the time comes.
Moffat’s gambit
Unless I’m missing something, as I understand it Moffat has already “done something reasonable when the time comes.”
Let’s Kill Hitler–River gave her regeneration “stuff” to the Doctor. It’s an easy way to not offend the 13 regeneration “canon” believers by using the Five Doctors stuff Christopher refers to above, and let us all keep enjoying the Doc. And of course, unlike the Master, the Doc came by it honestly. Well, depending on what he said in her ear… 😉
So, as I read the tea leaves, this one’s pretty much already resolved.
Lime
http://hlime.wordpress.com
Armillary Observations
Not how I interpret it
That's actually not what I got out of that scene. My interpretation was that she used some (all?) of her regenerations somehow to halt his current death, but not necessarily transferring extra lives to him. I guess we'll have to wait and see (or accost Moffat with that question at a con or something), but I read it as still being up in the air.
Openended
Way I see it, if that’s one possible (and reasonable) interpretation of the scene, then Moffat has his out. :p. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to read it that way… And Moffat is def a fanboy, so he knows all about stealing regenerations… Just sayin’.
True enough
Sure. That’s certainly a reasonable interpretation. I’d just like to think that Moffat will go with something more obvious and clear-cut when the time comes. But we all know that he doesn’t consult me on such things. 🙂